|
HUMAN HEALTH
The presence of LAS in many commonly used household detergents gives rise to a variety of possible
consumer contact scenarios including direct and indirect skin contact, inhalation, and oral ingestion
derived either from residues deposited on dishes, from accidental product ingestion, or indirectly
from drinking water.
HUMAN TOXICITY
Acute toxicity
The oral toxicity is greater than 3000 mg/kg bw (Huntingdon, 1984) and the dermal toxicity is
greater than 2000 mg/kg bw (Huntingdon-a, 1986).
LAS is severely irritating to the eye at concentrations of about 50%, while is moderately irritating
at 5% and non-irritating at 1% (Huntingdon-b, 1986; BIOLAB, 1988; BIOLAB-b, 1989; BIOLAB, 1983).
The irritating effects diminishes with rinsing after the exposure.
LAS is irritating to skin at a concentration of about 50% after 4 hours of exposure, while it is
moderately irritating at a concentration of 5%, and not irritating at 2.5%, after 24 hours exposure.
Sensitisation
LAS is not a contact sensitiser, on the basis of both animal (Hüls, 1988; Procter &
Gamble, 1985; RBM, 1985), and human volunteer tests (Procter & Gamble, 1997).

Repeated dose toxicity
Many studies are available for the repeated dose oral toxicity. In view of the available information
it is not possible to determine which single study is the most reliable or appropriate for the
determination of a NOAEL. Because of that, based on data from all the studies, a NOAEL (No Observed Adverse Effect Level) of 85 mg/kg bw d
is proposed, which is the NOAEL value closest to the lowest available LOAEL (Lower Observed Adverse Effect Level) (115 mg/kg bw d). This
NOAEL is the dose with no effects on renal biochemical parameters that has been observed in a 9-month
study of oral toxicity in rats (Yoneyama et al., 1976*).
Genotoxicity
In all in vitro and in vivo assays there is no indication of genetic toxicity for LAS (Hüls, 1993; Inoue
et al., 1979 and 1980; Sunakawa et al., 1981*).
Carcinogenicity
The oral long-term studies performed did not indicate any potential for carcinogenicity of LAS and
showed no effects or histopathological findings at doses up to 300 mg/kg bw d (Buehler et al., 1971;
Fujii. et al., 1977 Yoneyama et al., 1977; Endo et al., 1980 *).

Reproductive toxicity
Results of studies on reproduction fail to show any adverse effects at any of the doses tested.
Developmental toxicity and teratogenicity
Some findings of maternal toxicity were found at low or relatively low doses, administered dermally
and by gavage to rats, mice and rabbits, but they are associated with irritation effects of LAS, either
on the skin or the gastrointestinal tract.
In other oral studies no effects were found in parental animals up to 780 mg/kg bw d.
To sum up, some effects, such as embryo death or deformities, decrease in pregnancy rate and litter loss
were noted in some studies at maternal toxic doses, but in general no decreases in the litter size, no
changes in the litter parameters, no malformations or significant difference in skeletal defects were
observed at oral doses up to 780 mg/kg (Tiba et al., 1976 *) and at dermal doses up to
1500 mg/kg bw d (Imahori et al., 1976 *(*) Japanese studies reported in IPCS, 1996).
Key references
Van de Plassche et al., 1999
Belanger et al., 2002
Holmstrup et al., 2001-a
Jensen et al., 2001
Huntingdon-a, 1986
Huntingdon-b, 1986
RBM, 1985
Buehler et al., 1971
|